I am currently working with a server where Copernic has been installed, and a shared folder named "indexfolder" has been configured.
The user who installed the Copernic client uploads files to be indexed into this shared folder.
At the moment, I have identified two possible configurations:
Option 1: Map the folder locally on the server using the path: D:\indexfolder With this setup, as soon as files are uploaded to the share, they are indexed automatically, regardless of the index refresh timeout.
Option 2: Map the folder using the network path: \\srvname\indexfolder In this case, the client is able to preview files and copy them locally. However, this requires setting a very low index refresh timeout, which has a significant impact on system resources.
Issue details:
With Option 1:
The client can perform searches and retrieve results.
However, users cannot preview files.
Users are also unable to copy files locally.
With Option 2:
File preview and local copy work correctly.
But indexing depends on frequent refresh cycles, increasing resource consumption.
Question:
How can I resolve the limitations observed in Option 1, while maintaining immediate indexing of newly uploaded files?
Hello,
I am currently working with a server where Copernic has been installed, and a shared folder named "indexfolder" has been configured.
The user who installed the Copernic client uploads files to be indexed into this shared folder.
At the moment, I have identified two possible configurations:
Option 1:
Map the folder locally on the server using the path:
D:\indexfolderWith this setup, as soon as files are uploaded to the share, they are indexed automatically, regardless of the index refresh timeout.
Option 2:
Map the folder using the network path:
\\srvname\indexfolderIn this case, the client is able to preview files and copy them locally. However, this requires setting a very low index refresh timeout, which has a significant impact on system resources.
Issue details:
With Option 1:
The client can perform searches and retrieve results.
However, users cannot preview files.
Users are also unable to copy files locally.
With Option 2:
File preview and local copy work correctly.
But indexing depends on frequent refresh cycles, increasing resource consumption.
Question:
How can I resolve the limitations observed in Option 1, while maintaining immediate indexing of newly uploaded files?
Thank you for your support.
Best regards
0 Votes
0 Commentaires
Connexion ou S'inscrire pour poster un commentaire